|
The Durupınar site is a large aggregate structure on Mount Tendürek in eastern Turkey. The site is north of the Iranian border, southeast of Doğubeyazıt, in the Ağrı Province, and eighteen miles (29 km) south of the Greater Mount Ararat summit, at an elevation of ~ above sea level. The size and shape of the structure has led to its promotion by some believers as the original Noah's Ark. However, there are both mainstream scientists and creationists who believe this is merely a slightly unusual natural formation. The site is near several officially unnamed peaks, though locals call one of the nearby peaks ''Cudi Dağı'' in Turkish and ''Çîyaye Cûdî'' in Kurdish, which David Fasold linked to Mount Judi ((アラビア語:الجودي) '), the mountain named in the Qur'an as the final resting place of Noah's Ark.〔Sura 11:044 from the Marmaduke Pickthall translation of the Qur'an: "And it was said: O earth! Swallow thy water and, O sky! be cleared of clouds! And the water was made to subside. And the commandment was fulfilled. And it (the ship) came to rest upon (the mount) al Cudi and it was said: A far removal for wrongdoing folk!"〕 Some researchers place Mount Judi in another location farther south near the Turkish/Iraqi border.〔(【引用サイトリンク】title=Mt. Cudi )〕 ==Discovery and exploration== According to local reports, heavy rains combined with three earthquakes exposed the formation from the surrounding mud in May 19, 1948. It was discovered by a Kurdish shepherd named Reshit Sarihan.〔(Edwin B. Greenwald, "Turk Reports 'Ship' Atop Mt. Ararat )," Associated Press article, 13 November 1948.〕 It was subsequently identified by Turkish Army Captain İlhan Durupınar—for whom it was subsequently named—in a Turkish Air Force aerial photo while on a mapping mission for NATO in October 1959. Durupınar informed the Turkish government of his discovery and a group from the Archeological Research Foundation which included George Vandeman, İlhan Durupınar, and Arthur Brandenberger, professor of photogrammetry, surveyed the site in September 1960. After two days of digging and dynamiting inside the "boat-shaped" formation, the expedition members found only soil and rocks. Their official news release concluded that "there were no visible archaeological remains" and that this formation "was a freak of nature and not man-made". The site was then ignored until 1977, when it was rediscovered and promoted by self-styled archaeologist and amateur explorer Ron Wyatt. Throughout the 1980s, Wyatt repeatedly tried to interest other people in the site, including ark hunter and former astronaut James Irwin and creationist John D. Morris, neither of whom was convinced the structure was the Ark.〔("Durupınar Site" from NoahsArkSearch.com )〕 In 1985, Wyatt was joined by David Fasold and geophysicist John Baumgardner for the expedition recounted in Fasold's ''The Ark of Noah''. As soon as Fasold saw the site, he exclaimed that it was a ship wreck. Fasold brought along state-of-the-art ground-penetrating radar equipment and a frequency generator, set it on the wavelength for iron, and searched the formation for internal iron loci (the latter technique was later compared to dowsing by the site's detractors). Fasold and the team states that the ground penetration radar revealed a regular internal structure and measured the length of the formation as , close to the 300 cubits (157 m, 515 ft) of the Noah's Ark in the Bible if the Ancient Egyptian cubit of 20.6 inches (0.52 m) is used.〔 Fasold believed the team found the fossilized remains of the upper deck and that the original reed substructure had disappeared. In the nearby village of Kazan (formerly Arzap), they examined so-called drogue (anchor) stones that they believed were once attached to the ark. Creationist commentators, such as Andrew Snelling in the Creation Ministries International journal ''Creation'', wrote that "there are no scientific principles employed" in the "so-called frequency generator" used by Wyatt's team. He called it a "gadget, which is generally advertised in treasure-hunting magazines, not scientific journals" with "brass welding rods being used in essence, as divining rods, similar to the use of a forked stick to search for water." Fasold asserted in his 1988 book that locals call one of the peaks near to the Durupinar site al Cudi (Turkish ''Cudi Dagi'', Kurdish ''Çîyaye Cûdî'') and linked this to the Mount Judi named in the Qur'an as the final resting place of Noah's Ark. The assertion is controversial and not well supported by local toponymy. After a few expeditions to the Durupınar site that included drilling and excavation in the 1990s, Fasold began to have doubts that the Durupınar formation was Noah's ark. He visited the site in September 1994 with Australian geologist Ian Plimer and concluded that the structure was not a boat. He surmised that ancient peoples had erroneously believed the site was the ark.〔〔 (full text )〕 In 1996, Fasold co-wrote a paper with geologist Lorence Collins titled "Bogus 'Noah's Ark' from Turkey Exposed as a Common Geologic Structure" which concluded that the boat-shaped formation was a natural stone formation that merely resembled a boat. The same paper pointed out that the "anchors" were local volcanic stone.〔 The abstract reads: A natural rock structure near Dogubayazit, Turkey, has been misidentified as Noah's Ark. Microscopic studies of a supposed iron bracket show that it is derived from weathered volcanic minerals. Supposed metal-braced walls are natural concentrations of limonite and magnetite in steeply inclined sedimentary layers in the limbs of a doubly plunging syncline. Supposed fossilized gopherwood bark is crinkled metamorphosed peridotite. Fossiliferous limestone, interpreted as cross cutting the syncline, preclude the structure from being Noah's Ark because these supposed "Flood" deposits are younger than the "Ark." Anchor stones at Kazan (Arzap) are derived from local andesite and not from Mesopotamia.〔 In April 1997, in sworn testimony at an Australian court case, Fasold repeated his doubts and noted that he regarded the claim that Noah's ark had been found as "absolute BS". Others, such as fellow ark researcher David Allen Deal, reported that before his death, Fasold returned to a belief that the Durupınar site might be the location of the ark. His close Australian friend and biographer June Dawes wrote: He () kept repeating that no matter what the experts said, there was too much going for the () site for it to be dismissed. He remained convinced it was the fossilized remains of Noah's Ark. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Durupınar site」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|